Archive | October, 2011

OpenClass, is Moodle 3.0 a la Google mode.

27 Oct

UPDATE (in cont. to my previous post “OpenClass is license and hosting free. What about reporting and integration?”):

Sannier posted this on his blog in answering to Joshua Kim’s 4 thoughts on OpenClass transparency (which in turn reflects on M. Feldstein’s post on Why OpenClass is a big deal). Socialnetworking makes the degrees of connection between my bother-in-law’s second cousin’s sister-in-law’s grandmother’s parrot and I look so simple.

I must say, in my opinion, Joshua Kim & Michael Feldstein do a wonderful job in asking the right questions, and getting answers to many of them. Thank you both! I’m looking forward to the coming discussions.

Sannier, in his post Josh Kim’s 4 Injuctions writes:

As Pearson better understands the integration and support models that the community will be receptive to, we will publish how we plan to provide those services commercially. Pearson will offer helpdesk, integration and other commercial services to help meet the needs of institutions that would choose Pearson to provide those services. Remember though that Pearson is committed to provide to OpenClass institution at no cost in a self-service way.

Some folks asked me: what do you mean OpenClass isn’t free? Well, it is and it isn’t. It depends. I really like this line by Feldstein on “How Much Does Free Cost?”:

“What is so valuable to Pearson that they are trying so hard to give away something that normally costs real money?” I asked Adrian something along these lines, and his first answer was that it accelerates the adoption of digital products.”

And I’d like to invite the reader to look into the business model of current LMS: assume Blackboard, Desire2Learn the two major paid LMS today. The payment goes for: licensing, hosting (if hosted outside), and support. This support includes integration with ERP systems and other third-party tools, as well as user and system reporting, If Pearson isn’t making profit on licensing and hosting but rather on services – and by charging for quintessential services like these that’s when the added value becomes more apparent. We realize institutions can’t live without them because it’s all about the data and content. It’s the middleman’s profit.

Aneesh Chopra, U.S. CTO, calls for “liberation of data” in education

26 Oct

At an Educause roundtable discussion Aneesh Chopra, United States Chief Technology Officer, called last week for liberation of education data. After the release of http://data.ed.gov  last June, the Federal CTO continues his push for open government as a means for networking and information technologies to benefit education through innovation. He puts it in three main ideas: one, blue button for student transcripts; two, a “reverse RFP” where startups ask universities to liberate student data; and three, a guidance memo to clarify open data requirements for courses.  As Chopra adds:

“Imagine if every student could get a downloadable document of his/her assessment, a personalized platform that translates from student performance to market reality. We need personalized platforms for each of our children that can translate into something meaningful. This is the kind of thing that can fuel products and services. Find where the data sits and find out a way to liberate that data.”

Idea 1: Blue Button for student transcripts.

The open government initiative pushes for higher education institutions to release student’s course records and other relevant data that allows students to have access and download them upon demand. The idea of the capability is to provide students with tool that let’s them track their academic path towards a career goal.  According to Mr. Chopra the Blue Button initiative has been implemented in Medicare allowing veterans to download their health records. During the roundtable at Educause, institutions like Georgetown University, Montgomery College, and Oakland University volunteered to participate in the Blue Button initiative in Education, according to this article from The Chronicle.

As in “allowing” Spotify, Scribd, Scoville, NYTimes, Klout to “access” my Facebook account and data, there’s potential for startups to come up with innovative solutions that “allows” (upon student’s permission) them to do something with that data. For instance, as I’m back in grad school now I’d love to I sign up for an app that would read my school transcripts and resume and tell me how far I am from becoming a programmer. Or according to my grades, what’s my GPA and how that affects me on a variety of career paths. Or a button that tells me what online resources can I use to improve my grade in Algorithms’ class. Similarly to Facebook, it’s absolutely possible, and prime, to publish data privacy policies with settings students have control at all times.

This College Retention Report published in 2004 (by act.org) identifies non-academic and academic factors affecting student’s decision in dropping college. All four factors pointed out as having “strong” influence are: ACT assessment scores, HSGPA, academic self-confidence and achievement motivation. Would it be helpful for them to have an app that could guide them? How far are you from your dream career? How can you get there? What loans can you apply for to help you get there? It’s something like your personal advisor, a mentor.  A dream, yes. A possible dream.

Idea 2: a “reverse RFP” where startups ask universities to liberate student data

In continuing idea one in two, reports that do not carry personal information or individual records could contribute to the innovation of these startups and bringing solutions that can lift enrollment, dual-enrollment, transfers, as well as graduation and retention rates. Can, in one hand, sharing course catalogs, campus news, and other information that are already publicly accessible through institutions’ websites  bolster the innovation of technologies, allowing startups like Inigral and Scrible?  As a heavy socialnetworking user, and a student always seeking for web resources that help me with my coursework, I can see that start-ups like these bring innovative solutions to leverage higher education institutions’ outreach. Can students consider colleges that make use of  socialnetworking channels? Considering it helps building a sense of community integrating incoming students, yes it may. Can applicants and parents be impressed with an institution’s innovative approach of  cloud based technologies adoption? Certainly. Has it happened yet in ways it can be measured? Not in concrete numbers.  That’s how socialnetworking comes into play. Institutions connecting through Twitter, for instance, could share how their enrollment numbers have been affected by Inigral, for instance. What about surveys students respond during orientation week? Can they measure how technology has influence their decision-making process? Or how they’ve heard about the school such as in a social app that tells them where’s everyone enrolling, admission rates, how are they paying for it? Last weekend, as I was sitting at a cafe an writing a couple of articles, a girl and a man sitting at a table next to me talking about which schools to apply and why. As they were talking, it sounded like she had hired him as a College Admission Consultant. As I eavesdropped, I thought what if all that information she’s asking  she could’ve gotten from one single app? For certain professions there exists already but they mostly entail min GPA required, admission fee, admission rates and other superficial data. What about something that includes a social tone to it like Facebook? It’s a possibility. While I should be careful in trying to predict what would happen, I’d just add it could be very interesting.

Idea 3: guidance memo to clarify open data requirements for courses.

My question in this idea is who. Who will design the guidance memo? Is it the DOE? Or the institutions?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.