Okay… so after all Articulate’s support isn’t so bad after all. After making a loud “noise” posting a blog spot “complaint in Articulate’s community forumI received some extra good attention. I had a 53 minute conference call with their Costumer Service and I was walked through Moodle to upload Articulate Studio zipped content in Scorm 1.2.
In Moodle, turn you editing mode on (as course editor) and select the drop-down menu “Add Activity” and select “Scorm/AICC”. In the new window, type this activity’s name and description, and select “Choose or Upload a File”. If you haven’t uploaded your ZIP file yet, you can do it so right now. Then click in Save – return to course or display, either one will work. When you chose to view your content you will visualize your activity’s description and, in the lower part of your window, select mode Normal and click Enter.
The screens you will get it’s are the ones above. One is in 1280×1024 and the other is 1024×768 resolution [which represents most of the web users population]. The content area is too little. My students will probably not be able to view Articulate’s left menu. You can see from both images that the area is too small. In Moodle Forum, I share my screen on this Articulate/Moodle area of content.
I don’t know if this is an LMS or Articulate setup, but regardless they don’t go together. At the end of our conversation, I asked Articulate if they could recommend an LMS that can read Articulate’s Scorm1.2 packages well.
Higher Ed institutions have specific CMS/LMS that matched several criteria either set by institution, staff, Faculty or developers. Once they select a specific LMS/CMS [ which in our case we're evaluating Angel, BBLearn 9, Moodle or eCollege] you can’t change your LMS to adjust to your authoring tool.
Articulate and Raptivity go really well for corporate usage. But not higher ed who can’t afford these technical differences and difficulties.

